![]()
I read Da Vinci code and Angels & Demons roughly 2 years back. It was around the time my orgy of reading novels reached its peak. Im giving my honest opinion on the Dan Browns 2 famous works. Here it goes.
Selling 60 million odd copies of any book is no mean task. Many writers wouldnt dare to dream of that. But that is precisely what Dan Brown managed to achieve with the 2 famous books. Why did they become best sellers? The reason is Dan Brown broght into light, some intriguing facts about jesus, christianity and the church. The reading public always loved such kind of conspiracy thoery related writings. How many of us suspected that jesus was married? How many of us noticed that one person in the famous Last Supper painting, was infact a lady?. Not many i guess. I remember asking a christian friend of mine about the Last Supper painting. Only after reading Da Vinci code did he notice Mary Magdalene in the painting.
But does selling millions of copies make Dan Brown a good author? Im afraid not. I would say is novels are well researched but not well written. New york times famously reviewed the book as “Dan Brown’s best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence”. For one, the first noticable shortcoming of Dan Brown’s books is that they are badly plotted. Langdon could be a famous professor of symbology and Iconology. But Langdon solving various puzzles and breaking codes within a short time is pretty farfetched. Beyond a certain point things become too predictable. It doesnt need a genius to guess that Langdon is going to break another code or solve another puzzzle in the next few pages. Its like the southindian movies in which our hero drives the guts out of numerous thugs he encounters, without a tiny scratch. One gets tired of the never ending treasure hunt. Another shortcoming is the flatness of the main characters in his books. His writing doesnt strike any emotional chord with the readers.
So Dan Browns mantra is simple : ‘ Pick on a sensitive topic. Create a conspiracy theory. Cash in on it’.
Several years from now, modern writers of fiction like Stephen King, J.K.Rowling , Grisham would still be remembered for their literature while Dan Brown would sink into oblivion once the interest in christian conspiracy theories fades off.
If you are a beginner then dont bother to read Dan Brown’s books ( atleast defer it to a later date). If you are a voracious reader and havent read the Brown’s books then forget that a person named Dan Brown even existed. If you are into cheap thrills, then ‘Da vinci code’ and ‘Angels and Demons’ are your cuppa.

August 14, 2007 at 7:56 pm |
We need more critical thinking among book reviewers–but that doesn’t explain the Dan Brown phenomenon. Salman Rushdie chastised an audience who admitted to reading Brown’s awful works. “Shame on you…” he told them and I heartily concur.
Talk about bad writers and spread the word when you find a good one. Maybe then the literary sphere will improve…
August 15, 2007 at 2:11 pm |
Compelling article on Dan Brown and his works to say the least ..Being a novice reader your post makes me ponder about reading the rest of the Dan Brown’s works too… As Cliff Burns has said you can direct novice readers like me by writin posts about good authors… Keep up the good work..
August 15, 2007 at 2:24 pm |
Thanks Ravi. Will come up with Reviews on works of better and popular writers of fiction like Stephen King, Crichton, Rowling. For purists,i will come up with reviews on few great classics i’ve read like Wuthering Heights , Fountainhead and To kill a MockingBird. Thank u all for the encouragement i’ve got till now.
August 15, 2007 at 4:17 pm |
LoL! dude, very blatant but humerous dig at Dan Brown. I remember you telling me the other day in chat about how u thought Dan Brown’s novels didn’t cut the mustard with you. Cool. Keep writing, and welcome to blogging world!
August 16, 2007 at 7:50 am |
Padipps.. Anything related to reading is not my cup of tea, So i dont have right to comment. Anyway keep posting..
August 16, 2007 at 9:05 am |
I dont think DanBrown is as *bad* as you portray. To write on a topic such as Marriage of Jesus requires years of research as against the famouse JK Rowling’s Boy Wizard “Harry Potter”. It may sound bitter but the fact is that the local versions of “Ambulimama” is much better than HarryPotter. Harry Potter is a MARKETING MARVEL but DA VINCE CODE is atleast making you think for a minute atleast. You dont gain anything either spiritually or mentallly by readin harry potter but with da vince,as I already mentioned,it makes you think for atleast few seconds. Also being myself a FOREIGNER when considering ENGLISH, I cant comment on DanBrown’s English. You need someone who brings up the truth in the history. HISTORY IS ALWAYS WRITTEN BY WINNERS and you need someone to actually verify it.
August 16, 2007 at 9:41 am |
For Venkatnathan :
1) ‘Writing on such a topic requires years of research’.. agreed. But how can you be so sure that everything he writes is true? There are many historians who dispute the claims made by Dan Brown. And not every one of them are conservative christians. Though its common knowledge that some gospels potraying Jesus as human were destroyed by constantine, its foolish to believe every similar allegations. Most of what Dan Brown wrote may be true and maybe not. Perhaps the truth may never see the light.
2)”It may sound bitter but the fact is that the local versions of “Ambulimama” is much better than HarryPotter.”. You must be kidding. I dont know why Harry Potter deserves such bad comaprisions.And what do you mean by telleing that you dont gain spiritually or mentaly gain anything by reading Harry Potter? I dont get it. Harry Potter is Fiction. Its meant to be read and enjoyed. They dont preach in Fiction. And you are the 1st person i’ve come across who says Dan Brown writes better than J.K.Rowling.
3)And im not commenting about Dan Browns English. I dont like his way of Story telling. And i’ve stated the reasons in the Post. THAT IS THE FOCAL POINT OF THE POST.
August 17, 2007 at 5:05 pm |
I agree with everythin u’ve said except one thign…
“If you are a beginner then dont bother to read Dan Brown’s books”
wht the hell!?!
i know lotsa ppl who hav started reading books big time after reading the Da vinci code…
When a beginner picks up a book.. he/she expects the story to be engrossing .. the book unputdownable..
whn thts the case.. the flaws, facts etc become secondary..
i started reading books after reading the da vinci code…
and yea.. i realized after reading the fountainhead.. to kill a mocking bird etc tht dan brown ’s books are actually pretty bad… but not for a beginner..
August 17, 2007 at 9:11 pm |
For Achu:
hmmm.. Thats an interesting point..
If a beginner wants an engrossing and unputdownable book then he/she must start with a better writer (of fiction) like Stephen king, Micheal Crichton, Jefferey Archer etc., Im sure their books are more entertaining than Dan Brown’s. My point is that Dan Brown’s books are’nt the ones beginners should start with. I have mentioned that they have to defer it to a later date.
You also mentioned that you started reading books only after you read Da Vinci code. But im also sure that you would have started reading novels big time if you had read any good book of Archer, Crichton or Stephen King first. You read Da vinci code first just coz it was popular at that time. I too never used to read any books till my 10th grade. The reason is that i never knew books were so good. After i read Harry potter(1) by chance there was no looking back. Sometimes its just the first novel that triggers the reading habit. Da vinci perhaps is not a bad book for a beginner to start with. But there are loads of better,engrossing,unputdownable books waiting out there to be read.
Another interesting thing i’ve observed. It may be totally irrelavant here : I’ve known many guys who’ve read Dan Browns books. Those are the only novels they have ever read. Maybe they read it coz of the popularity Dan Brown’s books enjoyed.
August 17, 2007 at 9:17 pm |
For all :
Thanks for the support you guys have given me. Your comments are the most welcome.
By far, the comments i’ve recieved have been very encouraging and intelligent . Thank you once again for bothering to comment in my blog. Every comment would encourage me to write a lot more.
August 19, 2007 at 2:57 pm |
Good post da .. (and funny pics to go along with it) .. keep up the blogging and don’t become lazy ..
On the dan brown front , i actually enjoyed his story telling style ( although it is a tad bit unbelievable on hind sight) – it is good for time pass ..
August 19, 2007 at 6:16 pm |
Great review though I would make one important distinction. Dan Brown’s book is copiously researched, not well-researched. He may have read a lot but that still begs the question whether he read well.
As for the reading experience, I am a devout Christian who read the book out of necessity to research Brown’s views and I distinctly felt a great let down when the story finally concluded. Contrary to many other readers, I felt the story was extremely claustrophobic and never went anywhere. The fact that it took half the book to get out of the Louvre and the conclusion of the book led him to … the Louvre. Then there were the centuries-old “startling realizations” that simply echo claims made since the dawn of Christianity (ask a Muslim) — this part seemed insipid. It was like he was trying to make a big deal about a discovery as obvious as the Eiffel Tower.
To your list of recommended writers, I would like to add Neil Gaiman, Tim Powers, and of course the perennial GK Chesterton.
August 28, 2007 at 3:01 pm |
Hey nice post..I must admit tht i enjoyed reading “Da Vinci Code”..if u treat the book as a work of fiction u will enjoy it..not necessarily debating about its authenticity..the second book “angels n demons” which is a prequel would make a great kollywood movie though!!!
October 7, 2007 at 1:59 pm |
I completely agree with you. i think Dan Brown is a grossly over-rated author. i am not saying i dindt enjoy his books but i have read books which are way better than his and havent got the same kind of recgonition!! Grisham, Archer, PGW are much better writers. i think u summed it up very well when u wrote his mantra of picking a sensitive issue and creating a controversy!!